ISO/TR. First edition. Safety of machinery — Risk assessment —. Part 2: Practical guidance and examples of methods. Sécurité des. TECHNICAL. REPORT. ISO/TR. Second edition. Reference number. ISO/TR (E). Provläsningsexemplar / Preview. Technical Report ISO/TR Ed. Written on 11 February Posted in Documents. ISO/TR Safety of machinery.
|Published (Last):||25 September 2010|
|PDF File Size:||7.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Other useful information in Clause 5 includes a discussion of the merits and limitations of uso and bottom-up approaches to hazard identification, and the appropriateness or not of creative thinking during different stages in the risk assessment process. In all six examples, considerable detail is provided, including graphs and tables where appropriate. Annex A gives examples of methods for several steps of the risk assessment process; and Annex B contains an example application of the process of risk assessment and reduction.
This Annex considers the risk assessment and risk reduction process for a single-spindle vertical moulding machine. The bulk of the document is taken up with Clause 4, Preparation for risk assessment, Clause 5, Risk assessment process, and Clause 6, Risk reduction. Everything that has been done from version 2 to 4.
Technical Report ISO/TR 14121-2:2012 Ed. 2012
Risk matrix Risk graph Numerical scroring Quantified risk estimation In addition, hybrid tools can make use of a combination of the above methods. December 1 article September 1 article July 2 articles June 1 article February 1 article. Harmonized Standards View online. Annex A – Examples of methods for several steps of the risk assessment process Six examples are provided as follows: Jon Severn, the editor of MachineBuilding.
Hazard identification by application of forms Risk matrices Risk graphs Numerical scoring Quantified risk estimation Hybrids This last example is a hybrid method of numerical scoring and a risk matrix. What we did from to April Archive 36 articles. December 2 articles November 1 article September 2 articles August 3 articles July 2 articles June 2 articles May 5 articles April 4 articles March 9 articles January 6 articles.
December 2 articles November 4 articles October 6 articles September 4 articles August 2 articles July 3 articles May 6 articles April 6 articles March 1 article February 8 articles January 11 articles. Principleswas published in September it was generally well received. However, given the iterative nature of the risk assessment process, a failure to include risk reduction might have been viewed as an omission.
December 7 articles November 2 articles September 3 articles August 2 articles July 7 articles June 1 article May 12 articles April 10 articles March 14 articles February 10 articles. December 2 articles October 4 articles September 1 article August 3 articles July 1 article May 1 article. Clause 7 – Risk assessment iteration This clause highlights the need to repeat all stages of the risk assessment after the protective measures have been incorporated.
Clause 4 – Preparation for risk assessment This clause states that the objective, scope and deadlines for the risk assessment should be defined at the outset. December 8 articles November 5 articles October 4 articles September 2 articles August 3 articles July 6 articles June 1 article May 3 articles April 4 articles March 14 articles February 10 articles January 9 articles.
Although it is described as ‘non-exhaustive’ it nevertheless contains considerable detail.
Most of the examples conclude with a discussion of the method and its suitability for different types oso machinery. Clause 7 covers Risk assessment iteration and Clause 8 covers documentation. All the Communications of the harmonized standards published since Given the title of this Technical Report, readers may be pleasantly surprised to learn that it includes risk reduction as well as risk assessment.
Technical Report ISO/TR Ed.
This clause states that the objective, scope and deadlines for the risk assessment should be defined at the outset. Running to around 21 pages, the example includes diagrams, tables and circuit diagrams. For a reader who is trying to decide which risk assessment method to use, a good starting point might be to read all the discussion sub-clauses before studying the detail of the examples.
It also notes the benefits of using a team for the risk assessment, and discusses the composition of the team and the role of the team members. Clause 5 – Risk assessment process This Clause is effectively a detailed explanation of the risk assessment process shown in Figure 1 of ISOexcept for a few steps – such as determination of the limits of the machinery, and hazard identification – where readers are referred back to ISO Written on 11 February While Clause 5 provides information on the criteria for selecting appropriate methods and tools for each step of the risk assessment process, Clause 4 highlights that consideration should be given to the machinery, the likely nature of the hazards, the purpose of the risk assessment, and the skills, experience and preferences of the team undertaking the assessment.
December 7 articles November 2 articles October 10 articles September 5 articles August 4 articles July 9 articles June 7 articles May 9 articles April 2 articles March 7 articles February 3 articles January 5 articles.
ISO/TR 14121-2:2012 ED2
Detailed discussions of each tool 41121-2 provided. It therefore contains numerous cross-references to Part 1; for example, readers are referred to Part 1 for all terms and definitions bar one.
In addition, hybrid tools can make use of a combination of the above methods. December 1 article November 1 article October 1 article September 2 articles August 1 article July 3 articles May 1 article April 1 article March 2 articles February 1 article. The evolution of CEM4 Annex B – Example application of the process of risk assessment and reduction This Annex considers the risk assessment and risk reduction process for a single-spindle vertical moulding machine.
This Clause is effectively a detailed explanation of oso risk assessment process shown in Figure 1 of ISOexcept for a few steps – such as determination of the limits of the machinery, and hazard identification – where readers are referred back to ISO This clause highlights the need to repeat all stages of the risk assessment after the protective measures have been incorporated.
Readers will also appreciate the two very useful Annexes: This last example is a isso method of numerical scoring and a risk matrix.